← scan anotherassay report

frisking…

pulling token + holders

cross-checking GoPlus safety flags

simulating the sell path

matching creator against launchpad factories

fusing drain verdict

← scan anotherassay report

frisking…

pulling token + holders

cross-checking GoPlus safety flags

simulating the sell path

matching creator against launchpad factories

fusing drain verdict

scan another

POOLSpools.trade

Robinhood Chain0x385b…71d5

Looks safe

No way for this contract to take or trap your funds

100

/ 100 safe

market riskNormal— Distribution and liquidity look ordinary

sourceson-chain auditGoPlussell-path simsell tax 0%buy tax 0%

price

$0.0013

mkt cap

$1.30M

liquidity

$238.8K

24h vol

$1.85M

holders

6,256

top holder

0.2%

Holders

6,203 holderstop 10 shown

identified

none recognised

top 10 wallets

0.9%

excl. LP & exchanges

in liquidity

—

pooled, not held

burned

—

permanently gone

<$1K $1–25K $25K+net worth across all holdings

0x9bd1…6f4d

no public track record

0.19%

—

value held

0xdd76…97a5Contract

An unlabelled smart contract, not a personal wallet.

0.19%

—

value held

0x1e87…1946

no public track record

0.19%

—

value held

0xaeb9…1461Contract

An unlabelled smart contract, not a personal wallet.

0.19%

—

value held

0x9f20…74bdContract

An unlabelled smart contract, not a personal wallet.

0.19%

—

value held

0xddb2…8be8

no public track record

0.18%

—

value held

0x9e01…35b5

no public track record

0.18%

—

value held

0x7712…3f60Contract

An unlabelled smart contract, not a personal wallet.

0.18%

—

value held

0x40cd…7db8Contract

An unlabelled smart contract, not a personal wallet.

0.18%

—

value held

0xa3c2…a5a0

no public track record

0.17%

—

value held

Names come from a curated KOL registry (kol-quest (MIT) full wallet dumps + live kolscan leaderboard) plus on-chain facts — we only label a wallet when we can prove it, and say anon otherwise. Net-worth tier and gain/loss are estimates. An LP holding a large share is liquidity, not a wallet that can dump on you.

Supply intelligence

5 wallets traced

No bundling found

No bundled supply detected

We traced the funding of the top 5 wallets and found no group large enough to suggest one entity holding through several addresses.

Dev is not in the top holders0x0000…d49b

The deploying wallet does not appear in the holders we sampled — it has either sold down, never held, or distributed to other addresses.

If they sold — estimated price impact

against $238.8K liquidity

top holder

—

top 5 together

—

top 10 together

—

Impact is an estimate from a constant-product model (sale size vs. one side of the pool). Real pools use concentrated liquidity and multiple venues, so treat these as magnitudes, not quotes. Linked groups are wallets sharing a first funder — evidence of a common origin, not proof of one owner.

Research & narrative

launched 2026-07-30 · 8d old

Ticker is contested

1 bigger token uses this same ticker

A $POOLS on robinhood holds about 16× more liquidity than this one. Most posts about $POOLS are likely about that token, not this contract — search by contract address instead. This contract has only existed since 2026-07-30, so anything posted before that is about a different coin.

of 24 by size

Other live tokens called $POOLS

Robinhoodpools.trade2026-08-07$3.8M Robinhoodpools.trade2026-08-07$37K Robinhoodpools.trade2026-08-07$36K Robinhoodpools.trade2026-08-07$34K Robinhoodpools.fun2026-08-05$28K Robinhoodpools.trade2026-08-07$24K

+17 more sharing this ticker.

Check the talk — searches already scoped to this contract

Contract address on XThe only search that cannot return a different token. Start here.$POOLS since launchPosts from 2026-07-30 onward — the window in which this contract existed.

Launchpad origin

deployer 0x000000e2… not matched to a known launchpad (factory registry is being mapped)

Price chart

POOLS · live from GeckoTerminalloading…Open full chart

Twitter/X Website DexScreener Explorer

Heuristic frisk — not financial advice, not a formal audit. A clean result is NOT a guarantee. Always DYOR.